Partituralis
A Reading List

Resources

Le fonti — the books, and what lies beyond them.

Orchestration is learnt slowly, from many teachers. The literature is older than one might suppose, and a great deal of what is worth knowing was set down a century or more ago. Below, the volumes kept within reach, and the corners of the internet that repay a return visit.

The cover of Samuel Adler's The Study of Orchestration, third edition — a pencil drawing of empty orchestral chairs and lyre-backed music stands upon a stage.

Samuel Adler, The Study of Orchestration — the standard textbook of the conservatories, and a fair portrait of the literature as a whole: the chairs are set, the stands wait, the players have not yet come in.

The literature on orchestration is, by the standards of any modern discipline, small. Half a dozen treatises form its spine; a further dozen or so books — practical, historical, idiosyncratic — hang usefully from it. A composer who has read them all is rare. A composer who has read none of them is, regrettably, common.

The standard treatises

Hector Berlioz — Grand traité d’instrumentation et d’orchestration modernes (1844, revised by Strauss 1904). The founding text. Berlioz writes as a composer, not a theorist; the prose is opinionated, lyrical, and frequently wrong on points of fact. It remains, after nearly two centuries, the most readable book ever written on the orchestra.

Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov — Principles of Orchestration (posthumous, 1913). The most systematic of the classic treatises. Drawn entirely from his own scores, with examples printed in full. Indispensable for the student; quietly authoritative for the practitioner.

Charles-Marie Widor — Technique de l’orchestre moderne (1904). A careful supplement to Berlioz, written when many of the instruments Berlioz knew had already changed. Particularly good on the late-Romantic woodwinds and the Wagnerian brass.

The twentieth-century books

Walter Piston — Orchestration (1955). The American textbook, dry, accurate, and exhaustive. A composer who absorbs Piston will write a competent score. A composer who absorbs only Piston will not write a memorable one.

Samuel Adler — The Study of Orchestration (1982; now in its fourth edition). The current standard in conservatories, with recorded examples and a vast quantity of repertoire excerpts. Adler is patient and thorough, and his ear is excellent.

Kent Kennan and Donald Grantham — The Technique of Orchestration (1952; sixth edition 2002). Less encyclopaedic than Adler, more focused on the act of writing. Useful as a second opinion when Adler is silent.

On the instruments themselves

Anthony Baines — Woodwind Instruments and Their History (1957). Still the best general history of the woodwinds. Baines was a player and a curator, and the book carries the authority of both.

Philip Bate — The Trumpet and Trombone (1966) and The Oboe (1956). Older, but compact and honest. Indispensable for anyone writing for brass with historical sensitivity.

David Boyden — The History of Violin Playing from its Origins to 1761 (1965). Not a book on orchestration, but the deepest single volume on what the strings actually were when the orchestra was being formed.

The strange and the singular

Cecil Forsyth — Orchestration (1914). A book of opinions by an English composer of the second rank, written in prose of the first. Read for its judgements, not its rules.

Gardner Read — Thesaurus of Orchestral Devices (1953). A catalogue, not a treatise. When you need to know whether something has been tried before, and by whom, Read is where you look.

Norman Del Mar — Anatomy of the Orchestra (1981). The conductor’s view of the instrument. Witty, observant, and full of the practical knowledge that treatises tend to omit.

“One reads Berlioz to fall in love with the orchestra, Rimsky-Korsakov to learn its grammar, and Adler to keep one’s self honest.”

— common counsel